Полнотекстовый поиск:
Где искать:
только в названии
только в тексте
слова в тексте
только заголовок

Рекомендуем ознакомиться

Остальные работы->Реферат
In the period from c. 1850-1914 economics and science were changing the world and lifestyles. Adam Smith introduced the idea of capitalism and gave th...полностью>>
Остальные работы->Реферат
Today, there are many kinds of windmills, some of which serve differen t functions. They are a complex alternative energy source. What to consider whe...полностью>>
Остальные работы->Реферат
Authority. Can it be abused? Abagail and the other girls in the play, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, strongly abused their position of power. Through ...полностью>>
Остальные работы->Реферат
High school is a strange time. After three years of trying to develop identity and friends in middle school, students are expected to mature immediate...полностью>>

Главная > Реферат >Остальные работы

Сохрани ссылку в одной из сетей:

Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper

Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world. Their ideas and philosophies spread all over the world influencing the creation of many new governments. These philosophers all recognize that people develop a social contract within their society, but have differing views on what exactly the social contract is and how it is established. Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau each developed differing versions of the social contract, but all agreed that certain freedoms had been surrendered for society’s protection and that the government has definite responsibilities to its citizens.

Each philosopher agrees that before men came to govern themselves, they all existed in a state of nature. The state of nature is the condition men were in before political government came into existence, and what society would be if there was no government. Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau created a revolutionary idea of the state of nature. They did not believe government should be organized through the Church, therefore abandoning the idea of the divine right theory, where power of the King came directly from G-d. Starting from a clean slate, with no organized church, they needed a construct on what to build society on. The foundation of society began with the original state of nature.

Hobbes’s perception of the original state of nature is what would exist if there were no common power to execute and enforce the laws to restrain individuals. In this case, the laws of the jungle would prevail where only the fittest survive. Man’s desires are insatiable. Since resources are scarce, humankind is naturally competitive, inevitably creating jealousy and hatred, which eventually leads to war. This constant state of war is what Hobbes’ believes to be man’s original state of nature. According to Hobbes, man cannot be trusted in the state of nature. Limits must be put on freedom and inalienable rights. Hobbes lived in the 17th century, and wrote during the time of the English Civil War. His political views were influenced by the war. Hobbes perceived that by bringing back the monarch, there would be an end to the civil war.

On the other hand, John Locke believes the original state of nature is a state of perfect freedom where men do whatever it is in their will and ability to accomplish. Every man has the liberty to arrange his life in the manner he chooses, however no man has the liberty to kill himself. Unlike Hobbes’ nature of constant war, Locke’s state of nature is peaceful, based on the fact that men do not want to risk their lives by constantly fighting. All men desire the right to live and respect that everyone is after the same thing. Locke has these views because he has more faith in people than Hobbes. Man, according to Locke, is governed by reason in the state of nature. Locke was influenced by the revolutionary upheaval in a different way than Hobbes. The war caused Locke to dislike violence and extremes. Stability was the central assumption of his thinking. Hobbes’ era started its reasoning from the assumption that man was naturally vicious or wicked, while Locke’s era was more optimistic about man’s nature and reasoning.

The original state of nature, according to Rousseau, is the perfect state for man, where he is free. In the original state, man lives alone in innocence where he is virtuous. Rousseau does not agree that man is an aggressive and greedy being in the original state of nature as Hobbes suggests. He argues that men are truly happy in the state of nature. Only when men become sociable, they become wicked. In Rousseau’s Social Contract, man is depicted as a “stupid and unimaginative animal.” Man has no reason or conscience when in contact with others. Possessions begin to be claimed, but the inequality of skill lead to inequality of fortunes. Just the idea of claiming possessions excites men’s passions, which provoke conflict, leading to war. Rousseau believes men are not perfect in their original state, but have the ability to live in a more perfect society with guidance of laws. Rousseau has the impression that if people believe they are part of the government, they will work, fight, and build, without complaining in the belief that what helps the good of all people is going to be beneficial to them. Rousseau was self-educated and based some of his theories on Hobbes and Locke.

Preservation of mankind is the law of nature established by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. In order to abide by this law, man enters into an agreement, forming the social contract. The social contract is a theory that view’s the foundation of morality being founded solely on uniform social agreements that serve the best interests of those who make the agreement. …

The rest of the paper is available free of charge to our registered users. The registration process just couldn’t be easier.
Log in or register now. It is all free!

Загрузить файл

Похожие страницы:

  1. Locke Mill And Rousseau Essay Research Paper

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Locke, Mill, And Rousseau Essay, Research Paper John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all dealt ... level or amount of freedom Locke, Rousseau, and Mill advocate for man ... in humans than the portrait Thomas Hobbes presents of man in Leviathan ...
  2. Locke VsHobbes Essay Research Paper Locke versus

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Locke Vs.Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Locke versus Hobbes Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, ... in the absence of government? Thomas Hobbes was the first to attempt ... and the rise of government. They differed however, in that Locke believed ...
  3. Hobbes Locke Rousseau And Machiavelli Essay Research

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, And Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper The thirteenth through the eighteenth ... is obvious that Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau all shaped modern political ... like this who were successful. Thomas Hobbes was born in 1588 and ...
  4. Hobbes Vs Locke Essay Research Paper Thomas

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke developed theories on human ... how it is established. Hobbes, and Locke each developed differing versions of ... do not want to risk their lives by constantly ... form of government. Hobbes, and Locke constructed their own versions ...
  5. Early Human Society Essay Research Paper Early

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Early Human Society Essay, Research Paper Early Human Society ... such as John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Thomas Hobbes wrote and collected ... constantly in competition with each other, leading to war ... to learn more about each other and of technology. ...

Хочу больше похожих работ...

Generated in 0.0014951229095459