Главная > Реферат >Остальные работы
Descartes And Method Of Doubt Essay, Research Paper
French philosopher Rene Desartes’s Meditation One: Concerning Those Things that
Can Be Called into Doubt is a method of determining which beliefs are certain
and which are doubtful. Descartes applied illusion argument, dreaming argument,
and evil genius argument. In this paper, I will discuss how method of doubt
supposed to work in general with examples and also why does Descartes adopts
this particular method. Furthermore, I will add how method of doubt enables
Descartes to achieve his goals and how he uses this particular method to
accomplish his goals. Descartes’s method of doubt is practically about sorting
out our beliefs and keeping the only absolute beliefs, which cannot possibly be
false. "?because undermining the foundations will cause whatever has been
built upon them to fall down of its own accord–I will at once attack those
principles which supported everything that I once believed." Descartes is
saying that because of the weak foundations the built will fall on its own
sooner or later therefore, he will "at once" attack his principles. I
have perfect example to use here. My Dad usually tells us what is the reason
behind Pakistan’s failure. When in 1947, Pakistan separated from India there
were no rules made and if there were they were not strictly enforced
consequently now Pakistan is falling apart. Now Pakistani people are doing
whatever they please to even though government is trying hard to discipline.
Since people are so employed making their own rules and breaking them nothing
seem to work. The purpose of my example is that when we start anything we must
have strong foundations, which must be secure and mighty powerful so it will
built up strongly. And if foundation is weak eventually it will collapse. (p.
214) 2 In dream argument Descartes argue which casts doubt on the truth on our
intellectual beliefs. For instance we normally think that world is in a
particular way, on the basis of our perceptions of the world. So, I know it?s
raining because I have perceptual belief that it’s raining. "How often has
my evening slumber persuaded me of such a customary things as these: that I am
here, clothed in my dressing gown, seated at the fireplace, when in fact I am
lying undressed between the blanket." In this sentence Descartes is trying
to explain that many time we dream and what we dream seem very real. According
to Descartes structure of the reasoning goes like this: (A) It looks to me that
it’s raining (B) So, I know that it’s raining The dream argument casts doubt on
the transition from A to B assuming that we cannot know what we can doubt. (A)
It looks to me that it’s raining (C) If I am dreaming then while it will look to
me that it’s raining when it’s not really raining. So, I cannot be certain that
it’s raining because it could be just a dream. (p. 215) The second argument
Descartes used is evil genius existence. Descartes used propositions of math
because math problems as 7+5=12 or cone have three does not rely on our senses
justification. Descartes used evil genius argument to prove that even a priori,
beliefs whose truth or falsity can be established independently of experience
could be doubtful. Maybe it’s evil genius, which is tricking us and making us to
believe that 3 7+5=12 or cone have three sides. Lets look at the structure of
the reasoning that will help us to understand little better. (A) It looks to me
that it’s raining. (B) If I am being deceived by the evil genius then while it
looks to me that it’s raining however, it’s not raining. So, I cannot be certain
that it’s raining because I could be just deceived by the evil genius. This
example confirm that if evil genius exist than we cannot be certain about
anything because it could be the evil genius that is tricking us and making us
believe in certain way. (p. 216) Also Descartes used illusion argument which
basically tells us how our senses deceive us. For example, I believe that it’s
raining based on vision. This could be false because vision can be uncertain.
"And it is mark of prudence never to trust wholly in those things which
have once deceived us." Descartes is telling us never trust your senses
which once deceived you because we cannot tell of course if we are being
deceived or not. (p. 214) These arguments form doubt on great numerous beliefs
we occupy. The only way out of this deadlock here would be, if we could tell
whether we are dreaming or being deceived. For example, if I knew that I was not
dreaming nor I am being deceived, then I would know that what is happening to me
was in fact the real incident. But the problem is we cannot be sure that we are
not dreaming or being deceived. Dreaming, illusion, and evil genius arguments
weaken all sort of knowledge from counting as accurate 4 knowledge. However, one
thing is certain in these arguments that they involve thinking. For instance, if
I am dreaming that it’s raining, I still think. Even if I am being deceived that
it’s raining, I still think. So, no matter if I am dreaming or being deceived I
am still thinking. From this cause, here is one thing for certain: that I think.
Descartes recognize that the fact he is thinking he exist because only what
exists can think. Lets look at this example: If I think that it’s raining
outside, I can be wrong about rain but I cannot be wrong about my thinking that
it’s raining. This method of doubt enable Descartes to achieve his goals
particularly at the end he came to conclusion that no matter if I am being
deceived or dreaming either way I am thinking, which is certain knowledge.
Descartes accomplished his goals by trying all the factors but finally at the
end he came to conclusion that no matter if he is dreaming, being deceived, or
his senses deceive him one thing is indubitable, which is thinking. In addition
to this, if he is thinking that means he exist because only those things which
can think exist. So, "I think therefore I exist." In conclusion,
Descartes’s method of doubt assumption that any belief that can be doubted is
false. Descartes used dream, illusion, and evil genius arguments lastly, came to
certain conclusion that no matter if he was being deceive or dreaming however,
one thing, Descartes argued, that was indubitable that he was thinking. And if
you are thinking that means you exist because something must exist to do the
doubting and thinking.
Sober, Elliott. Core Questions in Philosophy. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs,
1995. Cress, A., Donald. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First
Philosophy. New York, 1999.
- ... the mind and body are separable and infinite by using his method of doubt to ... think it, Descartes was sure that he could not doubt his mind ... physical substance, are separable and immortal. However, Descartes questions whether the physical ...
- ... can’t, does it follow that Descartes’ method of doubt is useless?It is very ... each of them at least some reason for doubt,? he commented. The results of ... not hard anymore; colour, shape and other qualities have changed. Nevertheless ...
- Descartes: Origins Of Knowledge Essay, Research Paper Descartes believed that the origin of knowledge comes from within ... distinguish cannot be called into doubt as long as we hold ... what is this “I”? Of what parts is it made of and how does it ...
- Descarte 2 Essay, Research Paper Descartes How does Descartes try to extricate ... Meditation One describes Descartes’ method of doubt. By its conclusion, Descartes has seemingly subjected ... that we can really grant Descartes – and this is certainly contentious ...
- ... “rotten apples” he has developed a method of doubt with a goal to construct a set ... is useful and necessary, "When Descartes begins to doubt in an epistemological mode, he ... "rotten apples" he has developed a method of doubt with a goal to construct a set ...