Главная > Реферат >Остальные работы
America’s prisons have been called “graduate schools for crime.” It
stands to reason: Take a group of people, strip them of possessions and
privacy, expose them to constant threats of violence, overcrowd their
block, deprive them of meaningful work, and the result is an embittered
underclass more intent on getting even with society than contributing to
Prisons take the nonviolent offender and make him live by violence. They
take the nonviolent offender and make him a hardened killer. America has
to wake up and realize that the current structure of our penal system is
failing terribly. The government has to devise new ways to punish the
guilty, and still manage to keep American citizens satisfied that our
system is still effective.
Americans pay a great deal for prisons to fail so badly. Like all big
government solutions, they are expensive. In the course of my studies
dealing with the criminal justice system, I have learned that the
government spends approximately eighty-thousand dollars to build one cell,
and $28,000 per year to keep a prisoner locked up. That’s about the same
as the cost of sending a student to Harvard. Because of overcrowding, it
estimated that more than ten-billion dollars in construction is needed to
create sufficient space for just the current prison population. The plain
truth is that the very nature of prison, no matter how humane society
attempts to make it, produces an environment that is inevitably
to its residents. Even if their release is delayed by longer sentences,
residents inevitably return to damage the community, and we are paying
top dollar to make this possible.
Why should tax payers be forced to pay amounts to keep
nonviolent criminals sitting in prison cells where they become bitter and
more likely to repeat their offenses when they are released? Instead, why
not put them to work outside prison where they could pay back the
victims of their crimes? The government should initiate work programs;
where the criminal is given a job and must relinquish his or her earnings
the victim of their crime until the mental and physical damages of their
victims are sufficed. A court will determine how much money the criminal
will have to pay for his restitution costs, and what job the criminal will
to do to pay back that restitution.
The most obvious benefit of this approach is that it takes care of the
victim, the forgotten person in the current system. Those who experience
property crime deserve more than just the satisfaction of seeing the
offender go to prison. Daniel Van Ness, president of Justice Fellowship,
All the legal systems which helped form western law
emphasize the need for offenders to settle with victims. The
offense was seen as primarily a violation against the victim.
While the common welfare had been violated and the
community therefore had an interest and responsibility in
seeing that the wrong was addressed and the offender
punished, the offense was not considered primarily a crime
against the state as it is today. (76)
Restitution offers the criminal a means to restore himself-to undergo a
change of character. Mere imprisonment cannot do this; nothing can
destroy a man’s soul more surely than living without useful work and
purpose. Feodor Dostoevsky, a prisoner for ten years during czarist
repression, wrote, “If one wanted to crush, to annihilate a man utterly,
inflict on him the most terrible of punishments…one need only give him
work on a completely useless and irrational character” (77). This is
what goes on in the “make work” approach of our prisons and it is one of
the contributing factors to prison violence. To quote Jack Kemp, author
Crime and Punishment in Modern America:
The idea that a burglar should return stolen goods, pay for
damage to the house he broke into and pay his victims for
the time lost from work to appear at a trial meets with
universal support from the American people. There is, of
course, a reason that the concept of restitution appeals to
America’s sense of justice. Restitution also provides an
alternative to imprisonment for nonviolent criminals,
reducing the need for taxpayers to continue building
Working with the purpose of paying back someone that has been wronged
allows a criminal to understand and deal with the real consequences of his
Restitution would be far less expensive than the current system.
Experience shows that the cost per prisoner can be as low as ten percent
that of incarceration, depending on the degree of supervision necessary.
Removing nonviolent offenders from prison would also relieve
overcrowding, eliminating the necessity of appropriating billions more
public dollars for prison construction.
Restitution would deter crime with the same effectiveness as prison.
Prisons themselves have not done much of a job when it comes to
deterrence. Nations with the highest incarceration rates often have the
highest crime rates. But studies of model restitution programs
that they greatly reduce the incidence of further crime, since they
sense of individual responsibility, making the offender more likely to be
able to adjust to society. Reducing recidivism is the most direct way to
Criminal justice authorities also tell us that it is not so much the
type of punishment that deters crime, but rather the certainty of
punishment. With respect to deterrence, virtually any sanction, imposed
swiftly and surely, has a deterrent effect. An effectively run
program will deter crime. It is believed that in many cases, aggressive
restitution programs would be a greater deterrent than the threat of
To quote author David Simon,
I remember talking in prison with a hardened convict who
had spent nineteen of his thirty-eight years locked up. He
was in for a heavy narcotics offense that drew a mandatory
life sentence. ” How in the world could you have done it?”
” I used to be a rod carrier,” the convict answered, “on the
World Trade Center building-eighty floors up, getting
eighteen dollars an hour. One misstep and I was dead.
With hash I could make $300,000 a week. One misstep and
I was in prison. Better odds.” (Simon 75)
The immediate payoff of crime is so great that many are willing to risk
prison. The certainty of restitution, by requiring payment, takes the
out of crime. The assets of organized crime members and big time
narcotics dealers, for example, could be seized at arrest and confiscated
conviction, with the offender ordered to make further restitution through
work programs. That is real punishment.
Many Americans believe in our current prison system, and
also believe that it is an effective form of punishment for the criminal.
Some would say that criminals can live decent, civilized lives in prison
graduate to decent, civilized lives in the free world. My question to
people is; how can criminals live civilized lives in an environment that
offers chaos and mild forms of anarchy? It is well known what goes on
behind closed doors in prison; terrible atrocities that make the blood
and the stomach curdle are the only thing these prisoners are accustomed
to while they are in prison. Most inmates learn little of value during
confinement behind bars, mostly because they adapt to prison in immature
and often self-defeating ways. As a result, they leave prison no
sometimes considerably worse-than when they went in. The first time
offender who is arrested for burglary does not belong in a prison where
only thing he will learn is how to become a better and more violent
Instead, why not make him pay restitution to the store owner whom he
robbed? In my opinion, if this form of punishment was initiated for the
lesser offender, our prisons will have the vacancies to incarcerate the
Jeffery Dahmers of the world in prison for life, instead of the infamous
to twenty, out in five”.
Crime is the result of morally responsible people making wrong
moral decisions, for which they must be held accountable. The just and
necessary response to such behavior is punishment, which may include
restitution for community service, stiff fines, or , in cases where the
offender is dangerous, prison. But let’s not kid ourselves any longer.
prison was not designed to cure the individual; it was made to lock him
- Alternatives To Corrections Essay, Research Paper Alternatives to incarceration Ever since the first prison opened in ... restricts an individual to his or her residence for specific ... participate in an intensive aftercare-monitoring program for six months and ...
- Alternatives To Prisons Essay, Research Paper Alternatives to prisonsToday, more than ever ... to confine inmates for the duration of their prison term. Thus, the ... end?1 Erickson, Tortsen. The Reformers; An Historical Survey of Pioneer Experiments ...
- Prison Essay, Research Paper The first prison films in American cinema were ... a depiction of the alternative society which inmates create for themselves — a world with ... realistic portrait of prison life — filmed in an actual prison and starring Tim ...
- Alternative Medicine: Chiropractic Essay, Research Paper Adrian Arbuckle ... treatment considers the whole person and “gives special ... adjustment or spinal manipulation. An adjustment is a procedure ... (Joseph, Chiropractic Myth Busters). For a long time, millions of ...
- Prison Essay, Research Paper Journey The more things change ... media attention coupled with an increase in overall population ... in search of something better for themselves. Sal was a typical ... train provide safe and legal alternatives. Likewise in present society ...