Главная > Реферат >Остальные работы
A Critical Analysis Of Shakespeare’s Hamlet Essay, Research Paper
A Critical Analysis of Shakespeare’s Hamlet
Hamlet. Is he an insane madman or a revengeful, scheming, genius? There
are many conflicting ideas and theories on this subject, and hopefully this
paper may be of some assistance in clearing up the confusion. The paper is
divided into three separate analytic sections beginning with the beginning of
Hamlet’s so called madness, and why it may have occurred. Next, is an analysis
of why Hamlet delays revenging his father’s death. To conclude the paper,
Hamlet’s incestuous acts towards his mother are discussed, in William
In the first act Hamlet seems to be in a perfectly sane state of mind
throughout all five scenes. It is in the second scene where the audience begins
to see a change in his character. Ophelia meets with Polonius and recalls the
meeting she had previously with Hamlet. She tells her father that Hamlet came
to her disheveled and in a shaken state of mind, speaking of “horrors.” (Act 2
Scene 2 line 94). Her father immediately believes that he is “Mad for thy
love?” (Act 2 Scene 2 line 95). Opelia answers a question posed by Polonius by
which she replied that she had told Hamlet that she could not see or communicate
with him any more. Her father makes reference to Hamlet’s madness once again by
proclaiming that what his daughter said, “… hath made him (Hamlet) mad.” (Act
2 Scene 2 line 123).
The argument of whether Hamlet is insane because of his love for Ophelia is
often debated, but a more confusing and complex situation is the struggle within
Hamlet’s mind. His personal struggle is revealed to the audience in scene one
of the third act. In this scene Hamlet recites his famous “To be or not to be-
that is the question:” (Act 3 Scene 1 line 64) speech. Here the the audience
truly realizes that Hamlet is torn two ways in his life. To be or not to be,
essentially is Hamlet debating on whether he should toil the pains of living in
such a harsh world and fight to avenge his father’s murder or take his own life.
Hamlet is confused as to whether he should avenge his father’s death when he
himself, as Sigmund Freud’s “Oedipus Rex Complex” suggests, wished to murder his
father to gain all of his mother’s attention. But, in the back of Hamlet’s mind,
which keeps him in constant turmoil, is his loyalty to his family and moreover
Hamlet, in act four scene two, meets with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and
he seems to be breaking down into insanity. Hamlet had just killed Polonius,
and his two friends were questioning him as to where he placed the body of the
dead man. The strange thing about this scene is that Hamlet seems to play with
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and does not give them a straight answer. Hamlet
has practically transformed into a different person and doesn’t seem to be
Next is another situation that cannot be totally explained. The situation
being Hamlet’s delays in avenging his father’s death. The first that Hamlet
learns of his father’s death is in act one scene five, where he follows the
ghost. Hamlet is told, by the ghost, that he (the ghost) is the soul of
Hamlet’s father, and that he was murdered by Claudius. This all took place at
the beginning of the play and Hamlet waited until the end of the play to get
revenge for his father’s murder. Then again there are different perspectives as
to whether Hamlet waited until the end to actually gain revenge. For within the
play there are many insinuations that Hamlet tortured Claudius all the way up
until he killed the king. Two instances are particularly evident. First, the
play within a play confirms that Claudius was the murderer of Hamlet’s father.
Hamlet stages the Murder of Gonzago in which the actor who is playing the part
of the king is murdered in the same manner that Claudius killed Hamlet’s father.
At the moment that the actor playing the part of the king is killed Claudius
leaps from his seat and rushes out of the theater infuriated. This violent
action by the king overjoys Hamlet for now he knows that it was Claudius who
murdered his father. More than the fact that he knows that Claudius is the
murderer, Hamlet is slowly and painfully gaining his revenge of his fathers
The other instance where Hamlet could have killed Claudius was in act three
scene three. In this particular scene Hamlet comes upon Claudius while he is
knelt in prayer. Hamlet draws his sword and intends to kill Claudius there in
prayer but then decides to wait. Hamlet comes to the conclusion that he should
wait until Claudius is commuting a sin so he will go to hell, as opposed to
killing him in prayer where he would then go to heaven. This is another example
as to why Hamlet procrastinates revenging his father’s death. The obvious
reason Hamlet waits is to bring more than just the pain of his sword to Claudius
and torture him until the end.
Finally, Hamlet’s sexual attraction towards his mother is to be discussed.
In act three scene four, Hamlet enters his mothers bedroom at her wish and first
kills Polonius, then proceeds to make love to his mother. This action is called
the “Oedipus Rex Complex”, which was invented by Sigmund Freud on the basis of
Oedipus the epic poem by Sophocles. This theory states that all young men wish
to destroy their fathers so that their mother’s attention will be guided on them
solely. Also the fact that Hamlet thought that Polonius was Claudius adds to
the evidence that Hamlet had the “Oedipus Complex”. Hamlet was obsessed with
his mother but before the situation in the bedroom escalated his father, the
ghost, appeared and reminded him of the plight which he was supposed to be
Hamlet’s madness at times is justified and at other times is pure insanity.
At first Hamlet seems to be going mad over the fact that he is not allowed to
see Ophelia. Then it seems that the fact that he is overwhelmed with his
father’s death, and begins to fight with himself over the thought of suicide.
He is then determined to gain revenge for his father and goes about torturing
Claudius in a systematic and genius manner. Finally, Hamlet is caught up in his
love for his mother which brings him back to the point of insanity. In
conclusion Hamlet is torn between two worlds, that of the sane and well and that
of the crazed and insane.
- Analysis Of Shakespeare’s “Twelfth Night” Essay, Research Paper Analysis of Twelfth Night William Shakespeare, arguably ... of Shakespeare?s career, probably in the year 1601, and most critics ... consider it one of his greatest comedies. ...
- Critical Analysis Of Hamlet Essay, Research Paper ... ? In Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, Hamlet struggles with these and ... existence really worth the troubles of life? In this monologue, ... life, and the afterlife. Shakespeare uses Hamlet’s feelings to express ...
- ... 16 March 2000 A Critical Analysis of ?A Midsummer Night?s Dream? William Shakespeare, born in 1594 ... , 1974. Kenneth, Muir. Shakespeare the Comedies: A Collection of Critical Essays. New Jersey: Prentice ...
- A Critical Analysis Of William Shakespeare’s Sonnet 138 Essay, Research Paper ... she is made of truth, is a perfect example. Shakespeare employs the traditional ... rhyme scheme of the English sonnet ...
- A Critical Analysis Of King Leer’s Daughters’Attraction To Edmund. Essay, Research Paper Shakespeare? King ... Lear is a story of treachery and deceit ... the character of Edmund, bastard son of the Earl of Gloucester. Edmund ...