Полнотекстовый поиск:
Где искать:
только в названии
только в тексте
слова в тексте
только заголовок

Рекомендуем ознакомиться

Остальные работы->Реферат
How is everything going back home? Everything here is fine. Although, I am very surprised where my family is living. The house is very small, with bro...полностью>>
Остальные работы->Реферат
Even though there were organized up rising against Europe, most of these organizations were independent tribes. These tribes were divided by religion ...полностью>>
Остальные работы->Реферат
One of their first big hits was ?Surfin? that was credited for starting the ?surfing craze.? 1962 they released the album Surfin Safari with the song ...полностью>>
Остальные работы->Реферат
Mark is most likely the first of the Gospels to be written because it is the shortest and tells of the ministry of Jesus. Mark stresses Jesus’ message...полностью>>

Главная > Реферат >Остальные работы

Сохрани ссылку в одной из сетей:

Morality Is Relative Essay, Research Paper

James Rachels’ article, “Morality is Not Relative,” is incorrect, he provides arguments that cannot logically be applied or have no bearing on the statement of contention. His argument, seems to favor some of the ideas set forth in cultural relativism, but he has issues with other parts that make cultural relativism what it is.

The first mistake is in his comparison following the example of there being different moral codes. In outlining and explaining the cultural differences argument, he gives an example that he began the article with regarding the Callatians and the Greeks, and their differences in funerary practices. Rachels asks that “from the mere fact that they disagreed, that there is no objective truth in the matter?” His answer is that “no,” and that the answer one could derive is that one of those beliefs is altogether incorrect and wrong. Here Rachels’ statement seems to negate that which he wants to negate but it is through manipulation of the parties involved and the adding of “facts’ that aren’t there. These two cultures in his example to not disagree about anything, there are simply two different ways they deal with death. Because they are different, doesn’t necessarily imply there is any disagreement. So my answer is yes, this example does mean that there is no objective truth, because we cannot say that their practice (Greeks vs. the Callatians) is incorrect or immoral as much as they can say our practices are immoral. To label a culture’s belief in certain practices as possibly being “mistaken,” doesn’t sound very openminded in any way at all.

The next example Rachels uses to make his point clearer, is that in certain societies, because they believe that the earth is flat, and factually the earth is not, by default the those that believe that it is flat are wrong. By itself this argument makes sense, and I would agree, but in how Rachels applies it, it doesn’t make sense. He is comparing and trying to relate two things so dissimilar that it boggles the mind to think of comparing them in the first place. To begin with, Rachels seems to be implying that since, one is obviously wrong and that we have factual evidence to the contrary, that is what makes them wrong. That works, but when it’s applied to something like morality and ethics like he is trying to do, it makes no sense. Since when and where has there ever been a fact based moral code? Who says morally what is correct and what is not within society or for that matter for the good of humankind? Reading further, he states that the whole point is that the original conclusion does not follow from the premise laid forth by the cultural relativists. This is true based on what he gives in the second example, but his example is construed in order to get such results. Next Rachels goes on to further try and prove cultural relativism has some problems. In the next section, he evaluates the seriousness of the cultural relativist and what that exactly entails. Looking at the consequences, he says that we, as cultural relativists, would have to condone the actions of another culture as not being less inferior. There is no problem there. Where the problem begins is when he brings up slavery and genocide, things that are considered immoral to our society in particular. On a personal note, I do not wish to downplay any of these things in our history, I am looking at this through my point of view and that is all. Genocide and slavery are pretty immoral to me personally, but if condoning it means that we wouldn’t push our own beliefs on another then so be It. It’s evil but a necessary means. This example he gives is an extreme, brought on by events in the world’s past history, again Rachels uses those constructions of our own moral code to judge that to do such things is wrong. I know Rachels didn’t necessarily say there was or wasn’t a objective truth, but here he suggests that there is one, at least in this context regarding genocide and slavery.

The objections I have to Rachels’ argument against morality being relative are pretty much limited to the way he applies his examples. He applies them in a way to win the support of the reader, but looking further into them, they don’t seem to be accurately applied or in some cases even seem hypocritical to those ideas of cultural relativism that he does support. There are some glaring problems I have with Rachels’ argument, otherwise he does bring up some good points about what he thinks is right regarding cultural relativism, and several of those examples that he does use are illustrated in a way to be understood by someone as simple as myself.

1.”Morality is Not Relative,” by James Rachels, edited by Louis Pojman, collected in Philosophy: The Quest for Truth. Wadsworth Publishing 1999.

Загрузить файл

Похожие страницы:

  1. Macbeth Attitude Changes Essay Research Paper WILLIAM

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Macbeth Attitude Changes Essay, Research Paper WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE: THE ... king. At the time James became James I of England, he ... his king, who is also a relative. The crime is treasonous and sacrilegious ... the fact that the murder is morally wrong, and the fear ...
  2. Arguments Against Relativists Essay Research Paper Arguments

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    ... Against Relativists Essay, Research Paper Arguments Against ... relativity. Quite simply, the cultural relativist is stating that he is relative ... absolute standard of morality is needed in order to ... eliminated. Notes 1. Rachels, James. “The Challenge of Cultural ...
  3. Deee Essay Research Paper LA Confidential1997Directed by

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Deee Essay, Research Paper L.A. Confidential 1997. ... L.A. Confidential is something much more serious, a post-morality play in ... takes place within a relatively short period and deals ... ?From Salon magazine, James Ellroy Interview. ?James Ellroy mailing list. ...
  4. Active Euthanaisa Essay Research Paper The Moral

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Active Euthanaisa Essay, Research Paper The Moral ... any moral difference. James Rachels puts the distinction ... that killing is morally impermissible and letting die is morally permissible ... overall. A quick and relatively painless death bypasses the physical ...
  5. Anglicans Puritains And Q Essay Research Paper

    Реферат >> Остальные работы
    Anglicans Puritains And Q Essay, Research Paper There has been a ... “Master James,” however, is no longer listed. Neither is he mentioned ... Walesby, situated in a relatively small Lincolnshire village and ... standards of private and public morality, or–through a so ...

Хочу больше похожих работ...

Generated in 0.0014669895172119